User Rankings Stats

For reporting issues with the OCNA site.
Post Reply
User avatar
TermiteHunter
Site Admin
Posts:1125
Joined:Sun Aug 29, 2010 7:12 pm
User Rankings Stats

Post by TermiteHunter » Mon May 14, 2012 10:37 pm

User Ranking by Number of Recommendations
Appears to include archived caches in the totals. A more accurate and current rating would only include active / unavailable caches.
If an overall history was intended then this would not need to be changed but I think it would be better without the archived caches included as they would never be awarded a recommendation posthumously.

User avatar
DudleyGrunt
Site Admin
Posts:2038
Joined:Wed Aug 18, 2010 1:27 pm
Location:Jessup, MD
Contact:

Re: User Rankings Stats

Post by DudleyGrunt » Tue May 15, 2012 10:31 am

Thanks. I can see it either way. The user ranking still reflects that they've hidden "recommendation-worthy" caches, even if some have since been archived. This might imply that is worth going after some of the CO's other caches, even if they've not yet received actual Recommendations.

When Groundspeak introduced their Favorite Points, I did actually go back and give points to archived caches. Might not help folks, much, but I had A LOT of points and the cache WAS one of my favorites. As I get low on points, I may go back and "unfavorite" them to redistribute the points.
Dave, OCNA Team Member
For the smiles, not the smilies.
Maryland Geocaching Society

Image Image

Post Reply