Search found 418 matches
- Tue Oct 17, 2017 10:40 pm
- Forum: Bug Reports
- Topic: Fubar log, unable to delete or edit?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3403
Re: Fubar log, unable to delete or edit?
Not just you. Interesting FUBAR, never seen anything like it. Checked with a browser I am certain ithink did not use in his attempts. You know, being a Chinese product and all... The logs are there but partially covered by this blue block structure preventing clicking on anything in the page even if...
- Tue Oct 17, 2017 10:35 pm
- Forum: Bug Reports
- Topic: Unable to download the gpx zip?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1833
Re: Unable to download the gpx zip?
He is correct.
Time to update it anyway Dated March 23rd
Time to update it anyway Dated March 23rd
- Sun Oct 15, 2017 12:46 am
- Forum: Geocaching
- Topic: Navicache
- Replies: 11
- Views: 9145
Re: Navicache
I visited the Navicache site just to see. I found the forum looked alive and attempted to add my post to the Final Thoughts thread. It failed so I am posting it here. I joined in Jan or Feb of 2011 while looking for alternatives to fill my geocaching interest. Found nothing since the only one nearby...
- Wed Aug 30, 2017 11:10 pm
- Forum: Geocaching
- Topic: Virts are back on GC
- Replies: 13
- Views: 8677
Re: Virts are back on GC
Well I see another major flaw in GS's award of virtual caches. After reading a bit of the geocaching reddit thread I see that Adventure Tom got one. While he owns (adopted I think) the oldest cache in NC with what has to be top fav point numbers (just 'cause it's still there, sortof) He is NOT respo...
- Tue Aug 29, 2017 10:03 pm
- Forum: Geocaching
- Topic: Virts are back on GC
- Replies: 13
- Views: 8677
Re: Virts are back on GC
You are magical in your prognostications O Great Yucky One. Nice call on the date of a virtual return of virtuals on GC I see the fav point , maybe lack of DNF's but not the NM response (unless it just shows attention to detail) A virt would or at least should never need Maint so it would not be dir...
- Sun Aug 27, 2017 10:12 pm
- Forum: Geocaching
- Topic: Virts are back on GC
- Replies: 13
- Views: 8677
Re: Virts are back on GC
Well it is a Virtual and Virtuals had (have) different guidelines to follow.Sabrefan7 wrote:...along with logging requirements.
Guess you could just leave a signed slip of paper on the ground nearby instead if you don't mind littering

- Sun Aug 27, 2017 12:12 am
- Forum: Geocaching
- Topic: Virts are back on GC
- Replies: 13
- Views: 8677
Re: Virts are back on GC
Found this moments later https://www.geocaching.com/blog/2017/08/virtual-rewards/ Apparently I am not too far off. I might have been in that list had I not begun archival of nearly all of my GC hides but then I have not been a PM for years now either (I'm sure that was part of the decision making pr...
- Sun Aug 27, 2017 12:11 am
- Forum: Geocaching
- Topic: Virts are back on GC
- Replies: 13
- Views: 8677
Virts are back on GC
ALMOST Just had a post today on our local GCGC forum from another Admin. He had been invited by GC HQ to publish a new Virtual cache. Apparently they awarded 4000 with the ability to publish a new Virtual cache on the site. A test run offered to a select few? A prize to award select members? I belie...
- Sat Aug 19, 2017 11:49 pm
- Forum: Bug Reports
- Topic: Unable to log find
- Replies: 11
- Views: 8673
Re: Unable to log find
Then I shall more directly state that log submission was successful and displayed no error at any point.
From the OCNA hotbed of NC using Tapatalk
From the OCNA hotbed of NC using Tapatalk
- Sat Aug 19, 2017 10:08 pm
- Forum: Bug Reports
- Topic: Unable to log find
- Replies: 11
- Views: 8673
Re: Unable to log find
Displayed on cgeo correctly for me following search of ou code just moments ago.
From the OCNA hotbed of NC using Tapatalk
From the OCNA hotbed of NC using Tapatalk