OPENCACHING NORTH AMERICA

Well I see another major flaw in GS's award of virtual caches. After reading a bit of the geocaching reddit thread I see that Adventure Tom got one. While he owns (adopted I think) the oldest cache in NC with what has to be top fav point numbers (just 'cause it's still there, sortof) He is NOT respo...

You are magical in your prognostications O Great Yucky One. Nice call on the date of a virtual return of virtuals on GC I see the fav point , maybe lack of DNF's but not the NM response (unless it just shows attention to detail) A virt would or at least should never need Maint so it would not be dir...

Sabrefan7 wrote:...along with logging requirements.

Well it is a Virtual and Virtuals had (have) different guidelines to follow.
Guess you could just leave a signed slip of paper on the ground nearby instead if you don't mind littering

Found this moments later https://www.geocaching.com/blog/2017/08/virtual-rewards/ Apparently I am not too far off. I might have been in that list had I not begun archival of nearly all of my GC hides but then I have not been a PM for years now either (I'm sure that was part of the decision making pr...

ALMOST Just had a post today on our local GCGC forum from another Admin. He had been invited by GC HQ to publish a new Virtual cache. Apparently they awarded 4000 with the ability to publish a new Virtual cache on the site. A test run offered to a select few? A prize to award select members? I belie...

Then I shall more directly state that log submission was successful and displayed no error at any point.

From the OCNA hotbed of NC using Tapatalk

Displayed on cgeo correctly for me following search of ou code just moments ago.




From the OCNA hotbed of NC using Tapatalk

Hi and welcome, Are you sure you placed 2 caches? I have not approved any from you and I see none from you or located in NY in our list of caches awaiting approval. I even took a chance and checked the "other guys" site. Found your name and a few variations but none of them are active or have any hi...

More on this now that I am on the desktop, I generally like the idea of an education in relation to a cache not limited to geology. My problem is with expecting a CO to still be active and participating when I choose to log one of their caches and the same applies for all members. I dislike any reli...

While not oppossed to the concept I am reluctant to go along with something that involves the need to contact a CO and await a response. Emails change, With the wait that such a cache would likely endure between finds there would likely be problems with missing unresponsive COs. I am confident that ...