OpenCaching Cumulative Cache Count

About the Opencaching Site
Post Reply
NativTxn
Site Admin
Posts:376
Joined:Tue Oct 05, 2010 10:19 am
Location:Snook, TX
Contact:
OpenCaching Cumulative Cache Count

Post by NativTxn » Wed Jan 19, 2011 1:02 pm

Has anyone looked at the other sites in the OC family lately and added up all the caches that are worldwide? If all of these sites were connected into one, it'd be a nice count.
If you hide it, they will come!
Image Image Image
My Website

User avatar
DudleyGrunt
Site Admin
Posts:2038
Joined:Wed Aug 18, 2010 1:27 pm
Location:Jessup, MD
Contact:

Re: OpenCaching Cumulative Cache Count

Post by DudleyGrunt » Wed Jan 19, 2011 2:51 pm

Not a very complete picture, but what I can come up with for now...

OCXX - Active Hides - Finds

US - 500 - 500
JP - 3 - 4
NO/SE - 207 - 1087
PL - 8663 - 225151 (Whoa!)
UK - 437 - 1297
CZ - Not specified on main page
DE - Not specified on main page
ES - UNK - has DE's front page
IT - UNK - has DE's front page
Dave, OCNA Team Member
For the smiles, not the smilies.
Maryland Geocaching Society

Image Image

User avatar
ijeep
Posts:120
Joined:Wed Aug 18, 2010 6:51 pm
Location:South Mississippi
Contact:

Re: OpenCaching Cumulative Cache Count

Post by ijeep » Wed Jan 19, 2011 5:48 pm

Święta krowa!
Bill, OC US Moderator, Division 6
Always waypoint the Jeep!

Mr.Yuck
Site Admin
Posts:2161
Joined:Wed Aug 18, 2010 2:09 pm
Location:York County, Va.
Contact:

Re: OpenCaching Cumulative Cache Count

Post by Mr.Yuck » Mon Jan 24, 2011 11:43 pm

DudleyGrunt wrote:Not a very complete picture, but what I can come up with for now...

OCXX - Active Hides - Finds

US - 500 - 500
JP - 3 - 4
NO/SE - 207 - 1087
PL - 8663 - 225151 (Whoa!)
UK - 437 - 1297
CZ - Not specified on main page
DE - Not specified on main page
ES - UNK - has DE's front page
IT - UNK - has DE's front page
Last I looked (and I didn't do it right now) Opencaching.de had over 40,000 listings, and who knows how many finds. Hey though, we're finally at more finds than caches hidden here in the US. That's a good thing, and I'd expect to see the finds way above the number of caches hidden in the future.
ImageImage

Post Reply