User Ranking by Number of Recommendations
Appears to include archived caches in the totals. A more accurate and current rating would only include active / unavailable caches.
If an overall history was intended then this would not need to be changed but I think it would be better without the archived caches included as they would never be awarded a recommendation posthumously.
User Rankings Stats
- DudleyGrunt
- Site Admin
- Posts:2040
- Joined:Wed Aug 18, 2010 1:27 pm
- Location:Jessup, MD
- Contact:
Re: User Rankings Stats
Thanks. I can see it either way. The user ranking still reflects that they've hidden "recommendation-worthy" caches, even if some have since been archived. This might imply that is worth going after some of the CO's other caches, even if they've not yet received actual Recommendations.
When Groundspeak introduced their Favorite Points, I did actually go back and give points to archived caches. Might not help folks, much, but I had A LOT of points and the cache WAS one of my favorites. As I get low on points, I may go back and "unfavorite" them to redistribute the points.
When Groundspeak introduced their Favorite Points, I did actually go back and give points to archived caches. Might not help folks, much, but I had A LOT of points and the cache WAS one of my favorites. As I get low on points, I may go back and "unfavorite" them to redistribute the points.